HCIIF™INFORMATION INTEGRITY

HCIIF IN PRACTICE · PEOPLE, WORKFORCE AND IDENTITY

One role change.
Several different records.

An employee moves from one project to another. The HR record is updated, but project allocation, organisational directories and role-based access do not change consistently.

The information
challenge.

Access decisions are only as reliable as the workforce information behind them.

HR, line management, project teams, security and technology services may each hold part of the employee’s current position. When those records conflict, the individual may retain access they no longer need while waiting for access required in the new role.

A technically effective IdAM or RBAC solution cannot create confidence in incomplete, outdated or poorly governed source information.

01 / ESTABLISH THE PURPOSE

Define the workforce event

Set the joiner, mover or leaver decision, access consequences and confidence required for the intended role or project.

02 / ASSESS THE EVIDENCE

Assess the workforce information

Use ECAM to assess identity, status, role, project and manager records and the authority behind them.

03 / GOVERN RESPONSIBLE USE

Verify at the point of access

Expose record conflicts and the Confidence Gap before accountable owners grant, amend or remove access.

04 / MAINTAIN CONFIDENCE

Govern access through change

Use the IIP to carry the confidence basis, approvals and reassessment triggers into IdAM and RBAC as circumstances change.

ILLUSTRATIVE INFORMATION INTEGRITY PASSPORT

What confidence is justified?

Confidence basis
Employment status and role are confirmed by authoritative sources; project assignment and access need are approved by accountable owners.
Justified reliance
Sufficient to grant, amend or remove access for the defined role and purpose.
Accountability
HR, the line manager, project owner, security and technology teams retain clear responsibilities across the JML process.
Confidence Drift and reassessment
A role, project, contract, location, manager, employment status or risk-profile change.

HCIIF difference

HCIIF tests whether workforce information is sufficiently current and authoritative for this access decision, rather than assuming one system holds the complete truth.

This example illustrates information-integrity management. It does not prescribe a specific HR, IdAM or access-control design.